Moral Dilemma

Exactly how should a court rule and who's rights should be followed? What's in the best interest of a child ?

Remember, when I told you about the Swedish couple that was forced to surrender their adoptive child back to its birth mum?
Would it have been better for the little one to stay with it's adoptive parents or was it really better to return to its rightful mother?

This is a though one, because the little child had most likely started to feel some sort of connection with it's adoptive parents and it's birth mother had agreed to give the child up for adoption. But it's not illegal for a birth mum to revoke such a decision she's entitled to change her mind.'

I suppose it was better for the birth mum to make such a change of heart, while the child was still pretty young and it's better she do something about it while she's still protected by the law than to wait until it might be to late.
I hope that the Swedish couple one day will be able to become parents, because losing a child in such a way most be like emotional torture. Sometimes things might not be meant to be, I know it may be little comfort in those words but still... What can you really say, it most be one of the worst nightmares for adoptive parents to experience.. Isn't that exactly what they all are fearing..!?

To be a parent your children doesn't have to be alive or live with you... But the loss is still the same...

© Taste of Kimchi, Elle


Related posts:

What's Seoul

Regrets

Discount Adoptee